| Rank | Name | Power | Posts | Likes | Comments |
|---|
| Rank | Name | Originals | Reposts | Likes | Comments | Power | Avg power/post |
|---|
| Rank | Name | Originals | Reposts | Likes | Power |
|---|
| Rank | Name | Originals | Avg likes | Avg comments | Power |
|---|
| Rank | Name | Firm reposts |
|---|
| Rank | Name | Total reposts | Firm reposts |
|---|
| Rank | Name | Originals | Likes | Comments | Power | Avg power/post | Avg likes/post |
|---|
| Firm page | Reposted by people | Likes | Comments | Power added |
|---|
| # | Author | Date | Likes | Comments | Power | Preview |
|---|
posts2.ten_by_ten per firm — the per-post quality flag TBD applies to flag posts that hit the 10-likes-10-comments threshold (or that meet the firm's ranking criteria for the period). Higher is better.The historic picture (D100 sheet, Q24.1 July 2025 → Q26.1 February 2026, ~7 months). Followers up 4.4% (6,148 → 6,420). Headcount up 3.2% (278 → 287). Followers per employee essentially flat (22.1 → 22.4). People posting up from 42 to 56 — a 33% jump. % posting up from 15.1% to 19.5%. Power score nearly tripled QoQ. The firm is materially more visible than seven months ago.
Bigger picture: Whitfield Marsh & Pemberton has the audience, the practice mix, and the leadership-transition narrative to make a real step-change in Q2-Q3. The 10x10 ranking, SoV gaps and content-theme audit all point at the same prescription: more of the existing team posting consistently on the practice areas where the firm already has IP. This isn't a strategy problem; it's an execution rhythm problem.
| # | Top-10 person | Posts used | Top-10 power |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marcus Bellfield | 5/10 | 592 |
| 2 | Eleanor Whitcombe | 8/10 | 545 |
| 3 | Sarah Mensah | 5/10 | 414 |
| 4 | Rajiv Patel-Hutchings | 7/10 | 399 |
| 5 | Oliver Hartwell | 10/10 | 380 |
| 6 | Saskia Lindquist | 6/10 | 298 |
| 7 | Priya Nadkarni | 1/10 | 260 |
| 8 | Fiona MacIntyre | 4/10 | 237 |
| 9 | Stuart McAllister | 5/10 | 227 |
| 10 | Daniel Whitlock | 1/10 | 212 |
| Firm 10x10 total | 52/100 posts | 3,564 | |
| Firm | Headcount | Active people | % posting | Followers | FPE | 10x10 |
|---|
| Rank | Name | Total reposts | Of firm pages | Of colleagues | Of external |
|---|
| Rank | Original author | Affiliation | Times reposted |
|---|
| # | Name | Profile |
|---|
| # | Name | Reposts | Profile |
|---|
| # | Name | Profile URL (from HR list) |
|---|
| # | Name | Q1 originals | Q1 reposts | Profile |
|---|
Strategic commentary — Whitfield Marsh & Pemberton • Q1 2026 vs Q4 2025
Five things to know about Q1 vs Q4 — Whitfield Marsh & Pemberton: [DEMO DATA]
Note: Whitfield Marsh & Pemberton is a demonstration firm with synthetic data. All names, statistics, and post content are illustrative.